CookbookHobbies and playNo. 48
A homebrew recipe book and batch logevery batch recorded, and the recipes worth repeating
Recipe No. 48Hobbies and play
- For
- A homebrewer forty batches into all-grain brewing, and a member of the local club
- You bring
- Recipe sheets, a brew-day notebook with wort on its pages, your gravity readings, a few bottles left to taste, and the AI assistant you already use
- You get
- A recipe book of house beers and a batch log with the numbers and tasting notes for every brew, with the recipe book on a link for the club
- Time
- An evening for your assistant to file the old notebooks and an evening for you to check them, then ten minutes on brew day, bottling day and at each tasting
- Works in
- know.sh on the web · the iOS app · your AI assistant, through MCP
- Keep it
- Private while you work; share one document by a read-only link when it is ready.
A brewer’s notebook is good on brew day and poor on every day after. The gravity readings are there, but the fermentation temperature was on a sticky note on the fridge, and the tasting that would have told you why batch 23 beat batch 20 happened at a club meeting and was never written down.
This recipe keeps two documents. Recipes holds the beers you brew on purpose: a finding per recipe, with its target numbers and the story of how it got there. Batches holds every brew: a finding per batch with a table of what actually happened — grain bill, hops, yeast, original and final gravity, fermentation temperatures, dates — and tasting notes at two weeks and six. Whichever assistant you use — Claude, ChatGPT or a local model — does the transcribing, forty batches at a time, and later reads across them and lines up what changed between the good batch and the rest. You check the numbers and write the tasting notes.
Your brewing software, if you use one, still does the sums on brew day. know.sh keeps the record of what happened after the numbers were planned.
What you will use
- Your AI assistant
- Transcribes recipe sheets and notebook pages into recipe and batch findings with their tables, files each new brew day, and compares batches of the same beer, citing batch numbers.
- Shelf
- One shelf, Garage brewery, whose line describes your system, so that batch findings can stay about the batch.
- Research document
- Recipes, the book you would hand another brewer, and Batches, the lab notebook.
- Finding
- One per recipe and one per batch; off-flavours filed as Problem, recipe changes as Decision.
- The editor
- Where you check every transcribed number against the notebook, set types and Key, and write the tasting notes.
- Revisions
- A recipe’s earlier versions, marked as yours or an assistant’s, with Restore if a change made the beer worse.
- Public link
- A read-only link to Recipes for the club, with the recipes still in development left out.
- The iOS app
- Tasting notes typed on the phone, with the glass in the other hand.
Method
-
1
Hand your assistant the notebooks
Connect your assistant to know.sh once, following the support page. Then give it your recipe sheets, the recipes your brewing software prints or saves, and photos of the brew-day notebook, a few pages at a time. Ask it to make a shelf, Garage brewery, described as “5.5 gallon (21 L) all-grain, electric kettle, fermentation chamber in the garage”, with two documents.
Recipes gets a finding per beer, titled with its name and style (“Porch Light — American pale ale”): target gravities, bitterness and colour, grain bill, hop schedule, yeast and fermentation plan. Batches gets a finding per brew, titled “Batch 44 — Porch Light, 14 June”, with a two-column table of what happened and the headings Brew day, Fermentation, Packaging and Tasting. Ask it to link each batch to the recipe it brewed, and to leave any figure it cannot read as a question mark.
-
2
Check every number in the editor
This is the step that makes the log worth having. Open each batch next to its notebook page, press Edit, and check the table line by line: a smudged 1.051 read as 1.015 will mislead every comparison after it. Fill in the question marks, file recipes as Observation, and mark the house beers Key.
When a batch teaches you something, change the recipe and add a line at the bottom: “Changed 2 June: crystal 40 cut from 1 lb to 8 oz, after batch 42.” The recipe’s Revisions keep every earlier version, marked as yours or an assistant’s.
-
3
File each new brew the same evening
From now on, after each brew day, give your assistant the day’s readings — a photo of the page or a few typed lines — and ask it to add the batch to Batches in the same shape: the grain bill as weighed, not as planned; hop additions with their times; the yeast and its pitch temperature; original gravity; fermentation temperatures as set and as read. Add final gravity readings and the bottling date and priming sugar the same way as they happen.
Read the new finding before you close the laptop. An assistant filling a template will happily copy the recipe’s planned numbers where your page says something else.
-
4
Taste twice and write it yourself
Tasting notes are where a batch log earns its keep, and they are yours to write. Two weeks after packaging and again at six, pour one, open the batch in the iOS app (in TestFlight beta), press Edit, and write under Tasting: appearance, aroma, flavour, mouthfeel, and the one thing you would change. Use the same order every time, so batches compare line by line.
When something is wrong — buttery, solventy, sour where it should not be — give it a finding of its own, filed as a Problem: “Diacetyl in batch 42”. A problem with its own title is a result of its own in Look up (⌘K), and can be counted across batches.
-
5
Ask your assistant to compare batches
Once a recipe has three or four batches behind it, ask your assistant to compare them in Batches: each batch’s gravities, apparent attenuation, pitch and fermentation temperatures and days to final gravity in a table, then every difference in ingredients or process, set against the tasting notes that followed, with batch numbers cited for every point. It can also leave a proposed note beside a tasting line where two things changed at once.
What comes back is a list of suspects, not a verdict. An assistant can do arithmetic on your readings and read your notes; it cannot taste the beer, and it can copy a number wrongly. Check anything you will act on, then write your conclusion as a Decision in the recipe.
-
6
Share the recipe book with the club
When the club asks for your pale ale, press Share on Recipes. The link is read-only and shows the recipes without your notes or highlights; copy it when it appears, because the full link is shown only once. A recipe still in development can be left out from its own page and included when it is ready.
Batches stays private: it is where the failures live, and the club only needs what worked. Set an expiry if you post the link on a public forum, and replace it if it travels further than you meant. When club members tell you how your recipe brewed on their system, leave yourself a Note on the recipe with what they found.
Specimen
Garage breweryBatches — every brew, as it happened
4of 4
Batch 44Porch Light, 14 June
Observation, 1 highlight, 1 note, 386 words
Brewed from Recipes, 1, with the crystal cut to 8 oz after batch 42.
| Batch 44 | |
|---|---|
| Grain bill | 9 lb (4.1 kg) two-row, 1 lb (454 g) Munich, 8 oz (227 g) crystal 40 |
| Hops | Magnum 0.5 oz (14 g) at 60 min; Cascade 1 oz (28 g) at 10; Centennial 1 oz (28 g) at flameout; Cascade 2 oz (57 g) dry hop, day 4 |
| Yeast | American ale, one packet, rehydrated, pitched at 66°F (19°C) |
| Original gravity | 1.051, 14 June |
| Fermentation | 64°F (18°C) to day 5, then 68°F (20°C), probe taped to the fermenter |
| Final gravity | 1.011 on 25 June and again on 27 June |
| Attenuation | 78% apparent, about 5.3% ABV |
| Bottled | 28 June, 51 bottles, primed for 2.4 volumes |
Tasting, two weeks (12 July). Clear, pale gold. Grapefruit and pine on the nose. Cleaner finish than 42 and 43, no butter. A touch thin.
Tasting, six weeks (9 August). Hop aroma fading, as expected. Still clean. Next time, 4 oz (113 g) more Munich for body.
Recipes — the beers worth brewing again
Shared from a library on know. 5 findings.
Five house beers from a garage in Dayton, written for 5.5 gallons (21 L) at 72% efficiency. Scale them for your system.
Brewed by and for adults. Each recipe lists what it contains, including wheat, lactose and the gluten in barley.
Findings
- 1Porch Light — American pale aleObservation, high importance
- 2Low Road — brown porterObservation, high importance
- 3Winter Kettle — oatmeal stoutObservation, medium importance
- 4Hayfield — saisonObservation, medium importance
- 5Sunday Wheat — American wheatObservation, low importance
Set with know.
Prompts to try
-
Your assistant, connected to know.sh (Claude, ChatGPT or a local model)
Using know.sh, read the document Batches on my Garage brewery shelf and compare every batch of Porch Light. Put each batch’s original and final gravity, apparent attenuation, pitch and fermentation temperatures and days to final gravity in a table, in a new finding called ‘Porch Light, batches compared’. Then list each difference in ingredients or process between batches and the tasting notes that followed it, citing batch numbers. Do not change the batch findings.
-
Your assistant, connected to know.sh (Claude, ChatGPT or a local model)
Using know.sh, read the document Recipes on my Garage brewery shelf and add a ‘Contains’ line to each recipe, listing which of the nine major US allergens it includes (wheat in wheat malt, milk in lactose, and so on) and noting that barley malt contains gluten. Where an ingredient’s contents are unclear, write it with a question mark rather than guessing.
-
Your assistant, connected to know.sh (Claude, ChatGPT or a local model)
Using know.sh, read Batches on my Garage brewery shelf and list every batch where the final gravity was recorded on only one date before bottling. Put the list in a new finding in Batches called ‘Bottled on a single reading’, so I can see whether those are the batches that overcarbonated.
Variations
- Cider, mead or wine: the same two documents work. Give each drink a shelf of its own, so each index stays readable.
- Entering a club competition? Make a document per entry, with the style description summarised in your own words, and have your assistant type up each judge’s score sheet as a finding from a photo.
- Grow your own hops? Link each harvest in a garden journal to the batch it went into.
- Baking with the spent grain? The bread baker’s log keeps those bakes, and each one can link back to its batch.
Where it falls short
- know.sh is not brewing software. It has no recipe calculator, no water chemistry and no gravity or bitterness formulas; your assistant can do arithmetic on numbers you give it, and can get it wrong.
- Nothing reads your instruments. Hydrometers, digital gravity sensors and temperature controllers do not feed into know.sh; you or your assistant type the numbers in.
- Club members read the recipe book; they cannot comment on it. Their questions and results reach you at the meeting or by email.
- Transcribing photographed pages is where assistants slip, and smaller local models may not read images at all. Check every figure it files; Revisions shows each change an assistant made.
A note on alcohol, sanitation and bottles
Indexed under
HomebrewingBatch logsTasting notesOriginal gravityFermentation temperaturesBrewing clubsBottle conditioning